November 25, 2020

Reconsider Jesus – The Bridegroom and the New Wine (Mark 2:18-22)


Reconsider Jesus – A fresh look at Jesus from the Gospel of Mark
A devotional commentary by Michael Spencer
Compiled and Edited by: Michael Bell
Table of Contents

The Bridegroom and the New Wine

18 Now John’s disciples and the Pharisees were fasting. Some people came and asked Jesus, “How is it that John’s disciples and the disciples of the Pharisees are fasting, but yours are not?”

19 Jesus answered, “How can the guests of the bridegroom fast while he is with them? They cannot, so long as they have him with them. 20 But the time will come when the bridegroom will be taken from them, and on that day they will fast.

21 “No one sews a patch of unshrunk cloth on an old garment. Otherwise, the new piece will pull away from the old, making the tear worse. 22 And no one pours new wine into old wineskins. Otherwise, the wine will burst the skins, and both the wine and the wineskins will be ruined. No, they pour new wine into new wineskins.”

Mark 2:18-22 – NIV

This selection of scripture actually combines two items that are usually dealt with separately. However, it seems to me that Mark is placing these together thematically and linking both to the previous (and following) sections. The theme is the profound break that Jesus’ Kingdom message makes with the religious status quo, particularly with that of the Pharisees and their strong orientation towards tradition. This theme is first sounded in the banquet party Jesus enjoys with Matthew and other non-religious persons; an obvious joyous celebration of a new appreciation of what God is doing in His Kingdom. And, of course, the sick person who was healed experiences both joy and newness.

Fasting is an aspect of many religions. Judaism required only one day of fasting, the day of Atonement.21 Fasts were sometimes called for by leaders and prophets in response to particular events, such as times of national danger, repentance or humility.22 Fasts also were observed privately for various reasons.23 Jesus never repudiated fasting, and fasted during his time of testing in the wilderness,24 but we do not find any extensive advice for his disciples to regularly fast though apparently the early Jewish Christians did continue to fast on some occasions.

During the time of Jesus, stricter Jews “fasted” two days per week from sunup to sundown. Some of their practices in fasting prompted Jesus’ strong words in Matthew 6: 16-18: “When you fast, do not look somber as the hypocrites do, for they disfigure their faces to show men they are fasting. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you fast, put oil on your head and wash your face, so that it will not be obvious to men that you are fasting, but only to your Father, who is unseen; and your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.” (NIV)

Clearly, some of the Pharisees were guilty of fasting practices that were a public performance. Barclay suggests they may have whitened their faces to appear pallid.25 Jesus’ attitude towards public religion was quite severe. He frequently warned against the hypocritical tendencies that accompany public fasting, prayer, giving and worship. (What would he say about today’s contemporary Christian music scene?) Like the prophets before him, he discerned that human beings are easily motivated to believe that impressing the audience is impressing God. Jesus bluntly says that “they have their reward.”

One period for which fasting was forbidden was during a wedding celebration. For as long as two weeks the bride and bridegroom were surrounded by feasting and friends, known as the “children” of the bridegroom. For many people, this wedding celebration was the biggest party of their life and was an occasion of joy by the entire community. Sorrow was banished and fasting would have been ridiculous and insulting. Jesus’ first century audience would have laughed at such an idea. Jesus is comparing himself to the bridegroom. The bride may have waited for years for his arrival to bring her into his family, just as the Jewish people had waited for the promised one. This time when Jesus is present and bringing the joy and freshness of the Kingdom is no time to fast, but a time to soak in the joy and gladness of such an event.

The illustrations of the patched garment and the “new wine/old wineskins” contrast the old and the new. Jesus is not breaking with Judaism, but with the “old” orientation of the strict religionists who teach the keeping of tradition over the mercy of God. The Pharisee’s gripe with Jesus and his disciples is plainer in other passages, but we can already see that those who sneered at Jesus’ fellowship with tax collectors and sinners were threatened by a “new” teaching that presented a God who is not confined behind traditions, but reaches out to include sinners in surprising ways. It was not the laws of Judaism or the God of Judaism or the heart of the serious Jew that Jesus spoke about; it was the loyalty to a kind of religion that did not move with God into the future and hope, but moved backward into tradition and, as a result, bound people to their old sins.

Jesus did not come to patch up such a system. He did not come to pour the new wine into the old wineskins. Traditional religion will always tear away under the dynamic pressure of the Holy Spirit at work in the Kingdom. God is active in His Kingdom, breaking down walls, setting people free, healing the hurting and including the outcast. This can’t be fit into a system that says God is a cosmic bookkeeper, counting our acts of loyalty to tradition. Some have felt these sayings reflect the early Christian movement justifying a break with Judaism and the creation of a new religion. More likely is that, from the outset, Jesus was confronting all who knew him with fundamental choices as to what relationship with God was all about and what God himself was like.

With Jesus comes joy and celebration. The time is foreshadowed when the bridegroom will be taken, but that is not the time Jesus is speaking. And it is not our time, when the resurrected Christ is alive in His people through the Holy Spirit in a way even the disciples during Jesus’ ministry could not appreciate. With Jesus comes a new dynamic. Not new, in the sense that Jesus proclaims and embodies the same God who delivered slaves from Egypt by His mighty hand, but new in contrast to all those human systems of religion that are predictable, stale and moribund.

So how then do I see fasting today? The new approach to fasting would be to treat it like an endorsed, useful, but neutral practice. No one is better before God for fasting or not fasting. One’s prayer might more focused and less distracted because of fasting, but it is not more effective than the prayer of of a young child, or a Christian who does not fast. There is a fine line that needs to be trod here. Christianity needs traditions that can give meaning and can shape spirituality, but at the same time needs to be careful to avoid any form of legalism, asceticism, or new versions of old rituals. Whether we are talking about fasting, tithing, or other meaningful spiritual practices we must remember that it is only through the person and work of Jesus that we have standing before God. The Holy Spirit is received through faith, not efforts or rituals.

So how do we hold these things in balance? There are two fundamental characteristics of true Biblical religion: Fear of God and Joy in God. These are not strictly “Old Testament/New Testament” opposites, but their general character is strongly affirmed in each testament. Without the fear of the Lord, i.e. the genuine appreciation of the character and reality of God revealed in scripture, our faith becomes shallow, trivial, filled with vanity and entertainment, man-centered and trendy. These are the curses of modern Christianity, so full of a diet of candy-flavored preaching and entertainment-oriented worship that the fear of the Lord is not even desired, but considered bizarre. In this kind of environment grows a church with no appreciation for moral standards, no reverence in worship, cheap grace and a low view of scripture. However, without Joy in God, other symptoms develop. We look to material pleasures and human relationships for our deepest satisfactions. We place God “up there” and do not desire his manifest presence. We un-empower the Gospel and are afraid to pray for the miraculous or the supernatural. We become legalists and moralists, suspicious of those who are intimate with God. Both these emphasis are needed in healthy religion.

In addition we need to be wary as outward actions hold a dangerous potential of seducing our pride. No matter what it is we do, if it becomes a performance evaluated on what people thought rather than an offering given to the Lord, we are hypocritical. At this point, human pride is its most seductive and dangerous. How easy to pray for human ears, to view our giving as our support of the church, to preach for applause, to sing for fame and to witness for the adulation of others. Beware when everyone speaks well of you.

However, God is moving forward into hope and true faith pursues His heart. The sound of Christianity that should be heard in the world is Joy. Christian people should be holy and happy. Worship ought to lift us up to God. There are a hundred ways to apply this truth, and many more ways to miss it. This is not a suggestion that church should be entertainment. Far from it. But it is saying that if, after all our insistence that we are worshiping and experiencing and proclaiming Jesus, we are dusty and dead, something is wrong. Christian Joy is not the manipulation of emotion, but the response of the whole person- spirit, mind, will, body and emotions- to the presence and the truth of God.

I am no great fan of the phenomenon of holy laughter or the entire current fascination with bizarre manifestations.26 I am highly skeptical of much of it. But, those of us who have worshiped for years in joyless, dry, boring, sleepy, unmoved lethargy have no place to criticize those who occasionally seem to affirm the observation that Christians have been into the new wine. May God visit us and bring the joy of the bridegroom! May we desire all of God and may we be thirsty for more and more of His presence and power in our experience, as well as in our doctrine.

Finally, we should realize that the “bursting, ripping” power of the Gospel is a continual application. Anywhere that the old, i.e. the human and fallen, dominates, the Gospel brings dynamic life and new life. This is part of our commission to go into the world as leaven, as a new colony, as pilgrims and aliens, as lights in the darkness. And once in the world,, we represent not the old, but the new, Christ and His Kingdom. This being true, why are Christians so often sided with and loyal to the old? Why do we so often fight that which brings liberation, freedom, life and joy to the world? Why have Christians been found among racists, among communists, among those who bomb clinics and among those who oppress women? The new is one new race in Christ. The new is God’s Kingdom over human utopias. The new is radical love not violence. The new is an identity in Christ that affirms gender and transforms relationships. I do not want to be judged as a “progressive”, but I do want to be found doing exactly what Jesus would do if he were here.

—————————————-

Footnotes:

[21] Lev. 16:31-34

[22] 2 Chron 20:3; Ezra 8:21-23; Neh 1:4-11; Jer 36:9; Joel 1:8-2:17

[23] 2 Sam 12:15-23; I Kings 21:27; Psalms 69:1-15, 35:13-14, 109:4-21

[24] Matthew 4:2

[25] William Barclay’s Daily Study Bible, Matthew 6:16:18

[26] When Michael Spencer originally wrote this in the mid 1990s, there was a phenomena experienced in several churches, originating in Toronto, Ontario, which was characterized by “outbreaks of laughter, weeping, groaning, shaking, falling, ‘drunkenness,’ and even behaviours that have been described as a ‘cross between a jungle and a farmyard.’” Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship Website. “Revival: History” – Retrieved 2009-08-28

 

Notes from Mike Bell:

1. What questions or thoughts come from your mind from what you have just read? What stood out to you?

2. Would you be interested in a paper or Kindle version of the book when it is available? Please email us at michaelspencersnewbook@gmail.com so that we can let you know when it is ready. This is an email to indicate interest only, I am not selling anything at this point, but I sure do appreciate the encouragement!

As usual, your thoughts and comments are welcome.

Comments

  1. A request for help here: Imagine you were writing a review or a blurb for a book cover. What would you want to say about Michael Spencer and Reconsider Jesus – A Fresh Look at Jesus from the Gospel of Mark. Why should I, the general public, want to buy this book?

    Okay, don’t just imagine it. Give me you some of your thoughts. Add your name (or initials) and hometown, city, state, country if you feel free. I would like to compile some of these into a document that I can present to potential publishers.

    Your assistance here would be greatly appreciated.

    Mike Bell

    • Michael Spencer has produced an extremely accessible and uniquely insightful series of meditations on the Gospel of Mark. Weaving with the text itself Spencer’s personal observations rooted in a lifetime of study and his piquant applications and observations of the recent North American milieu is both exciting and challenging. The Gospel of Mark has been described as a practical, “just the facts, mam” account of Jesus’ short ministry. This book by Michael Spencer tracks with the same dynamic.

      Tom Christian
      Kingsport, Tennessee

    • Burro (Mule) says

      Michael Spencer didn’t write to outrage, dazzle, or condemn. His writings are like a spiritual antihistamine, clearing up long blocked theological passages and letting fresh air penetrate them again. It may be that the smell of that environment is disagreeable or noisome, but that is not Michael’s fault. It is our fault for letting the air get so disagreeable.

    • Drawing on scholarship and insights gained from an active ministry of many years, Michael Spencer guides us through the Gospel of Mark in a conversational and colloquial style. The study of Mark, the earliest and in many ways the most enigmatic of the gospels, benefits from Spencer’s unique combination of book learning and life learning.

      Stephen B.
      Washington, DC

  2. “Why have Christians been found among racists, among communists, among those who bomb clinics and among those who oppress women? The new is one new race in Christ. The new is God’s Kingdom over human utopias. The new is radical love not violence. The new is an identity in Christ that affirms gender and transforms relationships. I do not want to be judged as a “progressive”, but I do want to be found doing exactly what Jesus would do if he were here.”

    was very moved by the idea that an identity in Christ transforms relationships, but then since the Incarnation of Our Lord when He took all of humanity to Himself in order to heal it, that opens the door to unlimited possibilities for all of our humankind
    Example:
    our first human response to being hurt is to blame.. . . to get angry.
    But there IS some greater strength needed to respond in the way of grace, from some kind of eternal perspective that normally can’t be had, but would be needed to see a situation from a long way off in a context far greater than is humanly possible . . . . in that sense, the way of love may kick in IF we love in the sense of wanting the good for the other, for the sake of the other.
    Most of us sadly only experience the ability to love at this grace-filled level in the midst of grief, when the loved one has passed on, and we realize that they were so much more to us than someone we had sometimes defined by their flaws and mistakes and weaknesses and their ability to disappoint. No wonder it is said that grief is holy to God.

    “I sincerely believe that Jesus wants a Church attentive to the goodness which the Holy Spirit sows in the midst of human weakness . . . . . ”
    “”Discernment must help to find possible ways of responding to God and growing in the midst of limits,” . . . .
    “By thinking that everything is black and white, we sometimes close off the way of grace . . . ” (Francis)

  3. You’re doing wonderful work with this, MikeBell.

  4. “why are Christians so often sided with and loyal to the old? Why do we so often fight that which brings liberation, freedom, life and joy to the world? Why have Christians been found among racists, among communists, among those who bomb clinics and among those who oppress women?”

    Because the old wine – power – tastes better to them. And they will choose to reign in hell instead of serve in heaven.

  5. Michael Spencer was brave. He was compelled to work against the grain of modern Christianity to form a more “Jesus shaped spirituality”. His writing requires a close reading. At first blush it may not appear revolutionary but careful attention reveals some prophet like tendencies which call out current practices and ideas and place a light on them. Michael sought to raise Christ alone into the awareness of, particularly, the evangelical world but the broader Christian world as well, awash in idolatry. The most insidious idolatry being the influence of current ‘Christian Form’.
    There’s a stab at it Mike.

  6. –>”So how then do I see fasting today? The new approach to fasting would be to treat it like an endorsed, useful, but neutral practice. No one is better before God for fasting or not fasting.”

    Oh, wow. That’ll blow some people’s minds, maybe even mine. I continue to reflect upon the numbers of times people fasted in the scriptures, and how often it seemed to “help” move God.

    Maybe, as the piece seems to allude, that’s mostly an Old Testament “mindset” and less applicable under the new covenant. Maybe fasting now is a lot like prayer is now, more for the person practicing the fast (or prayer) than expecting a benefit to come from it.

    • “Maybe, as the piece seems to allude, that’s mostly an Old Testament “mindset””

      “Murica-anity” prefers the OT mindset and God much better. Marcionites!

    • Burro (Mule) says

      As someone who belongs to a communion committed to frequent and periodic fasting, I can say that Michael is right. No one is “better” for having fasted, or “worse” for not having fasted. I only know that I am not yet vibrating with divine love for “the least of these”. My spirit gravitates toward what my body is doing. Restricting my diet is a good way to remind me that I need Christ more than meat, the Church more than cheese, and the Scriptures more than wine.

  7. I’m loving the blurbs! Keep them coming!

    • Christiane says

      Mike, thank you for furthering the memory of Michael Spencer. He was something of a prophet which I think is now becoming more clear to us in the recent time of vast fundamentalist-evangelical capitulation into trumpism. Even now after the election that ‘bond’ with trumpism continues and I’m just hopeful that in time there will be some kind of healing from this very deep wound to the Church. Michael’s insight into the problems in that group of Christians was a foretelling of trouble to come, in my opinion.