September 29, 2020

Internet Monk Radio Podcast #124

podcast_logo.gifUPDATE: A generous friend has stepped in to resolve the computer issue. Such wonderful people in the IM audience. Thank you!

This week: Evangelical Christians and Obama Christians.

Our sponsors are: Rhodes: The band with our great intro music.

New Reformation Press. Order your copy of the Treasury of Daily Prayer from NRP. And do it soon.

Zaccheus Press– Fine Catholic Books, including Priestblock 25487.

The Wonder of Creation.

Want to be an IM advertiser? Want over 400,000+ unique visitors with close to 5.5 million page views last year to see your ad on the sidebar? IM has the most diverse readership in the blogosphere. Contact me if you are interested. Outstanding rates available on request.

Comments

  1. Now that was refreshing. Thank you!

  2. I was reading recently that Konrad Adenauer, the West German post-1949 Chancellor, refused to take part in anti-Hitler conspiracies (like the recent Tom Cruise movie) based on those Bible verses about respecting the magistrates
    (though his family prayed for a German defeat). But its not clear what this “respect” should consist of- is any attempt to change the government wrong?
    Contra David Barton, was the American Revolution blatantly anti-biblical?:)

  3. A protestant thing? boy am I glad Rome does not define who is in the church and who isn’t, they might even include observances.

  4. Interesting podcast – two thoughts.

    First – it has always seemed to me an occupational hazard of being a “confessing church” (rather than an apostolic one). How much conformity and on what issues “count”? So I would agree (pace willoh) that this is a Protestant phenomenon (the crucial difference with Rome being that instead of of _one_ definition of who the church is, you have exactly as many definitions (give or take a few) as you have Protestant Christians.

    However – it seems that you maybe take this too far. What are the minimum requirements for being a “professing Christian”? You seem to imply that all that is needed is for someone to say “Yeah, I’m a Christian”. That seems to render the word “Christian” essentially meaningless, as it comprises under the same identification Joseph Smith, John Shelby Spong, Watchman Nee, Arius, and Kate Schori. Surely there is _some_ minimum (however bare), to which one must assent in order for one’s status as a “professing Christian” to be more than an empty form of words? I imagine that virtually no one in your audience shares any communion of belief with Spong at all (at least not as regards anything specifically Christian – we would probably all agree that slavery is bad), yet you would seem to be committed to defending his inclusion as a “professing Christian”. That seems absurd to me, frankly.

    Just my $.02

    thomas

  5. Man, your intro cracks me up everytime I listen! Particularly that you do your own introduction!

  6. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

    In the essentials, unity. In non-essentials, liberty. In all things, charity.